Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 203, Issue 16 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 05:04:16 -0800 (PST) |
Sharon — I’m not sure I can picture how a substantive debate about dealing with “sexism” did not promptly reveal and highlight these two wildly contrasting views about the meaning of the word “sexism”. Did this controversy endure for weeks? Or, half a meeting? Thanks, RPD PS: Freud discussed the sexuality of children at considerable length, and caught considerable flak for his extraordinary theories. > On Dec 16, 2020, at 6:16 AM, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org wrote: > > The first group I worked with that consciously made a commitment to consensus > decision-making was a group starting a cooperative school. We just couldn?t > figure out a curriculum solution that one woman in particular would accept. > Finally someone realized that we were talking about "sexism" in terms of > discrimination by gender and she defined ?sexism? as sexualization of > children, particularly pre-teens and teens.
-
Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 203, Issue 16 Philip Dowds, December 16 2020
- Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 203, Issue 16 Sharon Villines, December 17 2020
- Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 203, Issue 16 Richard L Kohlhaas, December 17 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.