|Re: Work participation success stories||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Kathryn McCamant (kmccamantcohousing-solutions.com)|
|Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:40:14 -0800 (PST)|
I love this assessment Sharon! I too wanted clearer rules and expectations, and had a hard time trusting that we could manage our multi-million dollar property without better tracking. Over the years, I had to let go or go crazy....and guess what? We haven't fallen apart. I think it is very important to set clear expectations about hours for getting the work done, or be willing to pay for someone else to do it. I have found clarity about expectations is much more important than tracking, and in fact, I wouldn't even bother to try to track hours now. Next most important is actively plugging in new people....its harder to figure out what to do than you might think. And yes to workdays. We get good turnout at workdays, and a lot gets done, and everyone has a good time working together. If you want someone to do more, you'll be much more effective inviting them to join you in some tasks than berating them for hours you don't think they contributed properly. Somewhat ironically, the reason we never agreed on a tracking system was that one of our members who did tons of work himself, was strongly oppose to tracking. And there is so much people do that is not visible. Be very careful about judging what other are or aren't doing. And then there are the times when we each just need a break....and I am so grateful when no one makes an issue of me not showing up from time to time. Katie -- Kathryn McCamant, President CoHousing Solutions Nevada City Cohousing www.cohousing-solutions.com On 1/4/21, 8:24 PM, "Cohousing-L on behalf of Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l-bounces+kmccamant=cohousing-solutions.com [at] cohousing.org on behalf of cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: There are many, many posts in the archives on workshare, but as someone noted most of them are complaints. With Covid we are in strange times but this how workshare at Takoma Village has developed over 20 years: 1. We figured out what needed to be done and how to do it and how to cluster jobs and form working groups around task areas. That took years. And acceptance on the part of some that freeform doesn’t work on a long-term basis. 2. After several years, we scheduled workdays so tasks could be organized around them and people would show up to work with others. And have lunch. The focus is on specific tasks — rake, sweep, wash, sort, etc. 3. We ask people to be the point person for a room (Living, Kids, Kitchen, etc.) or a specific service (elevator, HVAC, parking gate, light bulbs, sump pumps, etc.) 4. New residents. The Resale and Rental group has organized tours and information sessions so we have a list of informed people well before a unit becomes available. When they move in they are well aware of that self-management means “you do the work." They get full information about tasks, workdays, teams, etc. And people listen. I would say that without exception, new residents are more involved than those they replaced. Even when the previous residents were significantly involved. Initially I was very committed to developing a system of recording workshare hours. I wrote policies and designed a database to track people and tasks. Studied the process of other communities. This went on for years. A few of us agreed to post the jobs we were doing and the hours we worked. We felt that some people just didn’t understand how much works was being done by others, or what the tasks were—this would educate them. I hated it. It was tedious and added work. And raised unresolvable issues about whether a task really took 5 hours, or if this task was really community work or work that needed to be done. I finally realized that I didn’t care how many hours people worked or how many more hours I worked. What was most important is that people were engaged and responsible. And the things I needed done to feel secure were getting done, even if I had to do them. Engaged means residents are “visible” on email, at meetings, etc. You know who they are and where they are. Responsible means reliable. We could depend on them to take responsibility for a task. Not just doing it in the moment but ensuring that outside help was contacted when necessary and the community was kept informed about any needed maintenance or upgrades. Being proactive. For example, one person realized early on that we needed a lighting monitor. She figured out all the kinds of bulbs we needed, organized the ordering so replacements were always on site, set up recycling for burned out bulbs, and found people on an ad hoc basis to climb the tallest ladders to change the bulbs while she held the ladders. She monitored and others informed her when bulbs needed replacing. This whole process was functioning well before many of us realized it was even being done. Years later she arranged her own replacement. This kind of proactive taking responsibility meant that for 20 years, neither I nor anyone else has had to even think about a burned out light. How many hours did she spend on this task? I have no idea—our bulbs are energy efficient and long lasting. But no matter if it took an hour a month, it was worth far more. We have others who have taken responsibility for other areas in the same way. I have taken on tasks that I thought needed to be done and just did them. Early on, asking for permission and finding who to ask for it, would have taken longer than doing the task. For some tasks, I was the only one who knew how to do them or knew they needed to be done. It has taken time for everything to get sorted out but we are now more formal about who is taking responsibility for what and have it posted on the website. There are still a few repeated requests for someone to take over this or that task but far, far fewer than we used to have. And there is less anxiety about whether they will get done or not. The largest problem is that we now have some huge 20-year replacement tasks that take a lot of time but are harder to divide and share. Having too many people organizing/supervising means communications get disjointed. Not good when dealing with consultants and contractors with $200,000+ budgets. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://L.cohousing.org/info
- Re: Work participation success stories, (continued)
- Re: Work participation success stories Fred-List manager, January 3 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.