On "consensed" [was Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 10:36:21 -0800 (PST) |
> On Jan 16, 2021, at 11:29 PM, Melanie G <gomelaniego [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > My post was very specifically about the term "consensed on". Not about > consensus being original to occupy... at ... all. I personally am not a > fan of such neologisms. To me they muddy the process of consensus, and the > meanings of words. It is absolutely not the same to me to "agree to" > something as to give one's consent. I agree. To consent is not to agree but only to consent. Although “consented to” is much less thuddy. Making up words sometimes does add clarity but "consensed on” I don’t find one of them. I belong to a list of copyeditors and writers to whom I regularly query for advice on word usage. I posted my question at 10:56 and immediately started getting responses. My question: In speaking of group decisions, “consensed on” is rapidly taking the lead over “consented to.” I know in my heart that “consensed on” thuds on the ear, and my spell checker doesn’t accept it, but what is technically wrong with it? > "Thud" seems to me to be too kind. Outside of this group of users (business > jargon?), the verb "consense" doesn't exist, and I sincerely hope it doesn't > catch on. > > Barf. Ugly and useless back-formation, surely just corporate jargon trying to > sound smart. > > ACK, YUCK, PTUI! It will never survive in anything I work on, if I can > possibly help it. > > It’s just plain ugly. There’s no need for it. "consented to" or "reached > consensus" on are just fine. > > There is no such verb as “consense.” Even visually, it goes against common > sense. :) > > I think “on” is the problem. Better to "consense about” or even “consense > around.” > > Congeal? Coalesce? Converge? Asymptotically approach? > > The use of consense is clearly not consensual here! :) There will be more — that was just the first 30 minutes on a Sunday morning. I don’t think “consensed” is going to make it onto a copyedited print page anytime soon. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail?, (continued)
- Re: Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? KAREN A CARLSON, January 16 2021
- Re: [External] Re: Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? Janet Boys, January 17 2021
- Re: [External] Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? Sharon Villines, January 17 2021
- On "consensed" [was Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? Sharon Villines, January 17 2021
- Re: On "consensed" [was Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? Chuck Harrison, January 17 2021
- Re: On "consensed" [was Request from Manzanita Village in Arizona: How does your community handle members who abuse the community e-mail? Elizabeth Magill, January 17 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.