Re: offensive language in the game | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:38:55 -0800 (PST) |
Sorry, but I don’t think I said, or even implied, “sanctimonious”. Thanks, RPD > On Mar 9, 2021, at 10:00 AM, Tom Smyth <tom [at] tomsmyth.ca> wrote: > > Dick and Philip, I'm curious what in this discussion is landing on you as > sanctimonious or not "cutting slack"? For me it's been interesting to hear > about why the term "personality disorder" is problematic for some folks. > Maybe because it's on email, it's easy to read derision or sanctimony into > people's responses? > > We need to be able to have uncomfortable discussions about such things. > Curious if you can suggest ways we can do so without you feeling like you > can't take part. > > -- > Tom Smyth
- Re: offensive language in the game, (continued)
- Re: offensive language in the game R Philip Dowds, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Dick Margulis, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Tom Smyth, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Dick Margulis, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game R Philip Dowds, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Sharon Villines, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Elizabeth Magill, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Dick Margulis, March 9 2021
- Re: offensive language in the game Elizabeth Magill, March 9 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.