|Re: language in Home Owners Association documents||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Patricia Lautner (lautnerpgmail.com)|
|Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:08:37 -0700 (PDT)|
At JPC, we don’t mention anything like this in our condo docs. Patti Lautner Jamaica Plain Cohousing Boston On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:58 AM Marcia Zuckerman via Cohousing-L < cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I’m at Bay State Commons; we're building a 30-unit urban community in > Malden, MA [occupancy Q1 2022!]. We’re reviewing our Home Owners > Association [HOA] documents and struggling with language about potentially > offensive activity. The current draft says, > > 8. OFFENSIVE ACTIVITIES. No owner may use or maintain his or her Unit or > the Common Areas appurtenant thereto for any purpose or in any manner which > is contrary to any applicable law, rule, regulation or requirement of any > governmental authority, or for any purpose which would constitute a > nuisance or be offensive to a majority of the Trustees. > > Some people are concerned about making the law paramount, given the > history of laws that supported slavery and outlawed currently legal > activities such as sodomy, cannabis, and miscegenation. Do other > communities make reference to laws in their HOA documents? > > > > Thanks, > > Marcia Zuckerman > Bay State Commons > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > >
language in Home Owners Association documents Marcia Zuckerman, September 28 2021
- Re: language in Home Owners Association documents Patricia Lautner, September 29 2021
- Re: language in Home Owners Association documents Sharon Villines, September 29 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.