|Re: Potentially dangerous dogs in cohousing||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Nancy Csuti (nancycsutigmail.com)|
|Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:38:18 -0700 (PDT)|
I just have to respond and ask you to read up on brews characteristics before making blanket statements about a breed. Pitbulls are not born aggressive. When my dad was a child (over a hundred years ago), they were called “nanny dogs” as their role was watching kids while parents worked in the fields. The belief that pitbulls are naturally aggressive and dangerous is incorrect. They can be bred to fight, as they often are. Please read the ASPCA and Humane Society descriptions of this breed before banning them. And remember, conspiracy theories apply to animals as well as vaccines. Nancy in Colorado. > On Oct 10, 2021, at 19:20, Dean smith via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > At Sunnyside village cohousing we’re discussing the admission of potentially > dangerous dogs into the community (we are a forming community and no one, > including pets, are in residence yet). Specifically, Pit Bulls, which are > bred for destructive aggression. We’re wondering if other communities have > policies about dogs (viscous or otherwise). If your community has eliminated > dogs, we’d like to know the reasons for that, too. > > Dean Smith > www.sunnysidevillagecohousing.com <http://www.sunnysidevillagecohousing.com/> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
- Potentially dangerous dogs in cohousing Dean smith, October 10 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.