|Re: Elevators and exclusions||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Marganne (margannemacnexus.org)|
|Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:14:52 -0700 (PDT)|
I know I'm relatively new to this block, but how about this:Make some kind of elevator or lift a priority and keep the project affordable by reducing expenses elsewhere.
What are the priorities of the project? I don't think affordability and an elevator are mutually exclusive.
At 9:14 PM -0400 5/11/08, melanie griffin wrote:
If the common house comes within the jurisdiction of the ADA or an even more restrictive local code, there may NOT be a choice. It is necessary to work out the priorities for the community, I agree, but if the authorities have decided accessibility is more important than affordability, they can't be ignored.
-- Cheers! Marganne http://cohousingsmallhomes.blogspot.com/ Small House Society http://www.resourcesforlife.com/small-house-society
- Re: Elevators and exclusions, (continued)
- Re: Elevators and exclusions mrbouchez06, May 9 2008
- Re: $19K elevator James Kacki, May 11 2008
- Re: $19K elevator Lise Beals, May 12 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions John Faust, May 9 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.