Re: Urban vs Rural low cost living
From: Matthew Whiting (
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
At 7:44 AM -0400 5/19/08, Sharon Villines wrote:
>So cities can be better areas for low cost housing than out in the
>country or the suburbs. Because people can walk to work, it also makes
>them very convenient.
Also, if you live a country life, meaning agricultural work, then living in
the country does mean walking to work, although you may have to drive your
"production" into town.  Living the city life in the country seems rather
expensive to me.

-Matt Whiting
Utah Valley Commons - forming

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.