Re: Marketing question for the men on the list | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jonathan Kallay (yonikallay.net) | |
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:08:11 -0700 (PDT) |
Consider that the decision to have a 55+ community might itself have a gendered quality. Men often thrive on relationships in which they feel that they are passing on skills and knowledge to younger generations, which on its face a 55+ community appears to preclude. The market has already provided for some time senior living oriented around male forms of bonding over shared activities, in the form of golf communities. Finally, consider that an important benefit of senior cohousing is to provide socially for people after the death of their spouses. For men, who have a lower expectation of outliving their wives, this can feel like planned obsolescence.
- Re: Risk Management <was: Re: Marketing question ...>, (continued)
- Re: Risk Management <was: Re: Marketing question ...> R Philip Dowds, July 12 2017
- Message not available
- Fwd: Risk Management <was: Re: Marketing question ...> Bob Leigh, July 14 2017
- Re: Fwd: Risk Management <was: Re: Marketing question ...> Sharon Villines, July 14 2017
- Re: Marketing question for the men on the list Joanie Connors, July 11 2017
- Re: Marketing question for the men on the list Mariana Almeida, July 13 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.