Re: Question about Consent Governance | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Jul 17, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Alan O'Hashi via Cohousing-L <cohousing-L [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > Phil, et al. - Speaking for myself, the "objections" I think are valid are > those based on whether or not the objection affects the good of the > community, versus an objection based on self-interest. And my oft repeated refrain: Who decides what is in the good of the community? Who decides what is “only” based on self-interest? Unfortunately unless you have a very clear vision-mission-aim statement and have connected the proposal to that, it will be the majority that determines the answer. This argument goes on the examine the purpose of community — Is it other than the self-interest of each person in the community as a member of the community? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Question about Consent Governance, (continued)
-
Re: Question about Consent Governance Dick Margulis, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Patti Lautner, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Philip Dowds, July 17 2018
-
Re: Question about Consent Governance Dick Margulis, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Sharon Villines, August 25 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Philip Dowds, August 25 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Muriel Kranowski, August 25 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.