Re: knowing what committees do & computers in cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Willson (John.Willson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 94 17:14 CDT |
I am perplexed by the number of suggestions for a computer network in a cohousing community. At Cascade CoHousing a large proportion of the members are computer literate and there are a significant number of computers on site, however for some strange reason the only computer professional in the group (me) does not have one at home, however I do take a machine home from work to often. On occasions it has been suggested we look at computer facilities and networks, however it never gets far probably for the following reasons: The cost of the setting up computer facilities and networks is high, and the percieved benifits are low. At least one member (me) believes computers and homes do not mix. I suppose its because they are too much like work. Computer networks are very good at diseminating written information, however you lose the personal contact. I thought cohousing was about communities of people, not computer networks. Discussions about important issues are much better in person as many more issues can be covered and the human element is included. Pen on paper as apposed to fingers on keyboard can also add more to a record. I have often found log books and minute books where people have added little comments in the margins and drawings as well much more stimulating to read. I suppse in general, I believe if you want to encourage a community of people then computers do not have a visable place. They still may have some uses but they should not become the main method of diseminating information and ideas unless distance is a factor. --- John Willson Cascade CoHousing Hobart - Australia (My views on phones and answering machines are similar - Why do I work with technology?)
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.