political | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: CV252 (CV252![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 94 20:35 CDT |
Re: Craig W's response to my question about housing prices: It would seem that I pushed a button, here, as they say in the social-work field. As long as someone's listening: (If this isn't something the majority of the list doesn't wish to address, please speak up!) I neglected, of course, to add the elderly, the disabled, and anyone else who's a check away from homelessness to those who are excluded from some of the creative housing solutions that are occasionally entertained. And of course, what would a discussion about single parents be without (more) discussion of child-support enforcement--not to suggest we get into that here. I'm not familiar enough with the ideologies of this list to comment on the political side of cohousing, but it seems that the economically chal- lenged are not forgotten in the idea, and that this is a practical step in the right direction that doesn't pretend to solve the failings of our system. Maybe the "restriction" of cohousing solutions to the middle-upper to upper income groups is beneificial, since eventually they can influence solutions for those with less financial and political power. Kim Van Dyke cv252 [at] albany.albany.edu 518-475-0135 518-478-7845 (fax) University at Albany State University of New York
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.