Re: Projected costs vs. actual cost | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsanmicrosoft.com) | |
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 95 10:59 CST |
Mark Frauenglass Mentioned in a post: >Our 2 bedroom projected cost went from $96K to $131K by the time >escalating construction costs and an enclosed remote garage were added (no >carports were allowed). I have noticed that so in all the figures I have seen so far, not one group has come in at the projected cost. In the case above, more than 30% off. So I wonder why projections are so far off in this case, and in others. I can understand why costs escalate. What I wonder is why initial projections often are very low. 1. Are initial projections, often used for marketing, low because that is what people want to hear and believe? 2. Are initial projections done by people who have no experience? One thing I have noticed, is that the initial volunteers and visionaries which form cohousing groups often want to beleive they are going to do affordable housing because that is what they have to do to be able to live there. Then there are the folks who stay in the project, long after the costs have gone over their budgets because, quite reasonablely, the longer and harder you work on the project, the less you want to give it up because you can not afford it. Part of what really sucks about this is that a great deal of your monthly payment is interest, not principal. Too bad some immensely rich communitarian can't form a less capitalist solution to lending to cooperative housing. Once the plans and specs are done, and the builders give bids and appraisals happen it is very very late in the cycle and then people are faced with the realization that they can not afford what they have created. I wonder if there is some way to get better information, earlier in the cycle about the real costs? And I wonder, if the real costs were known, how would people deal with it? Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.