RE: Individualism and togetherness | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 95 18:35 CDT |
Joani asked: > Am I too pessimistic to think that those who opt out of the dining/cooking will be the >same folks who rarely come to meetings, who don't know "our" kids too well, >who share themselves very sparingly with others in the community, who do their >share of the work mechanically if at all? I even worry that certain >expressions of individualism, if practiced by a significant percentage of the >group, could lead to its eventual demise. Because we are only in the beginning prototype stages of cohousing in America, we will not have an good data, on what I would call community sustainability, for several years. The intentional communities that have been around for several decades now, and all those which have disbanded, have many lessons to teach us. In my own inquiries into community sustainability the common thread that long term communities seem to share is a commitment to a specific shared vision or purpose. How will Cohousing Communities change when everyone went through the struggle to start the community is gone? How will new people adopt and define the culture of cohousing? Will the cooperative attributes of cohousing, such as community dinner, shared resources, child friendliness, social design, and neighborhood cooperation and security frame the definition of cohousing in such a way that the people who buy into it expect and want those things, and want them enough to be creators of those processes? I think so and I think those attributes of cohousing have consistently come across in most all the national press on Cohousing I have seen recently. If those were not the things you wanted, then why live in cohousing? In each community there will be individual variations in levels of participation at dinner, how involved with kids a person is, how much they socially interact with others. However, the grand sum of everyones contributions are much bigger than the parts. Keep in mind that the proper evaluation of cohousings level of community is not against some ideal, but rather, how much better cohousing is to the regular suburban reality. I can't imagine the expectations of existing cohousing groups would ever fall so low as to mirror the "real" world. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
-
Individualism and togetherness Joaniblank, April 11 1995
- RE: Individualism and togetherness Rob Sandelin, April 12 1995
- Re: Individualism and togetherness Mmariner, April 13 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.