Re: REsonse to some of Johns post on community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 95 16:17 CDT |
I find it really difficult to believe that people would go through all the angst of becoming real estate developers if all they wanted was to build a "safe" home, or just to add a little excitement in their life. Are you actually working on a cohousing community John? Much of what you posted doesn't jive with what I have learned about cohousing from doing it, nor anything else I have heard from others doing cohousing either. I would agree that anyone who relied on this list for their information about cohousing would get a skewed view of the world - much of the value of this list is access to people who have experience and can give answers to the difficult development questions that we face in becoming real estate developers. In my experience, which is limited but growing, I hear people who are investing in cohousing developments pretty much all tell me they are searching for a way to create closer relationships with their neighbors. My impression is that these folks are willing to do it all from scratch because they believe that having a closer connection to their neighbors is a better way to live and they are willing to sacrifice time and energy to create a place where this can happen. They do not believe, that where they currently live, offers them this opportunity. Could cohousing be created in a trailer park? I don't see why not. Could cohousing be created in strawbale sheds? I don't see why not. Can cohousing happen in existing neighborhoods? I really hope so, because that is where the future of cohousing lies. When the existing pioneering communities (exclusive yuppie enclaves?) show the world that working collaboratively with your neighbors, communicating your issues, and agreeing to work together and helping each other, has such huge advantages, then a bunch of people are going to want that too. Whether they live on golf courses, or in trailers, or in one room adobe huts, or a mixture of all the above. There is a very exclusive golf club community (Echo falls) not far from Sharingwood, and in comparing it to Sharingwood I would offer the following five differences: 1. Echo falls is not resident designed to meet the needs of the residents, it was designed to maximize developers profits. 2. There is no social covenant expected. That is to say, you can totally ignore your neighbors if you want. This is not the expectation at any cohousing community I am aware of. 3. There are no communication covenants expected. You can say whatever you want to, however you want to, including being totally destructive of all relationships. In cohousing, communication is set up so that relationship enhancement is the primary goal. I don't know of any existing cohousing community that doesn't have some sort of communication or process committee to help people resolve their issues and help them communicate. 4. In golf course development there is no "group" which is the standard for making decisions. In cohousing and other forms of community, you often make decisions based on what is best for the group, even though this is not what is best for you. 5. In golf course development there is no reliance on neighbors, you are expected to be independent. In cohousing, you rely on your neighbors to at least make you dinner once and if you need to, you can rely on them for quite a lot of help. >From the outside, Sharingwood looks just like a regular, newish suburban neighborhood. From the inside, it is very, very different. If you equate condo's and their common spaces with cohousing communities, then all you are seeing is the outside and you are missing most of what goes on. The fact that the traffic on this list has a lot of development issues is not surprising. However, there has been a fair amount of traffic over the last year on values, communications, facilitation, meetings, conflict resolution, all of which are topics which are germane to any type of intentional community. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.