Re: The "lot" development model | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pablo Halpern (phalpern![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 95 11:03 CDT |
> From: mtracy [at] ix.netcom.com (Martin Tracy) > > <Pablo and Martin continue a discussion on pricing the "lot" model> > > Why is a $100,000 land price a "bargain" if you're going to build a $220,0 > home? If you were going to build it outside of cohousing, the price of th > (and development) wouldn't vary much with the price of the house, would it > did Frank "pay less for his plot"? Now we get the the heart of the matter. The price of the lot and deveopment *does* vary with the price of the house because ... as a rule, people don't build expensive houses in poor neighborhoods where land is cheap and people don't (can't afford to) build cheap houses in rich neighborhoods where land is expensive. In a mixed-price development such as ours, we had to find some middle-ground and then make it work for those building inexpensive houses. Frank "pays less for his plot" because he is effectively building an expensive house in a mid-priced neighborhood. Maybe this is fair (he is giving up the advantages of being in a rich neighborhood) but it is not practical if we still want to include less-well-off families. > If you separate the lot (plus development) price from the house price, cou > you say that the $120,000 home was still subsidized by the profit from the > $220,00 home, but that both had $100,000 lots? Wouldn't the $120,000 home > be a bargain? No, you have to sell the $120K home (plus $100K common costs) for $250K, not for $220K. Otherwise there is no profit that can be used to subsidize the smaller houses. What portion of that $250K is for the land? What difference does it make? The important thing is that it is much harder to make a profit on building the house if the house is not built by the developer (us). > I have a feeling I'm missing out on a much larger principle here... To tell you the truth, we made decisions first and then figured out why they were necessary later. I would guess that most of the people in New View do not understand these principles. I have become more clear on them in the process of trying to explain them to cohousing-l. - Pablo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pablo Halpern (508) 435-5274 phalpern [at] world.std.com New View Neighborhood Development, Acton, MA, U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: The "lot" development model, (continued)
- Re: The "lot" development model Pablo Halpern, April 11 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model IAN_HIG, April 11 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Martin Tracy, April 12 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Martin Tracy, April 12 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Pablo Halpern, April 19 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Martin Tracy, April 19 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Pablo Halpern, April 25 1995
- Re: The "lot" development model Martin Tracy, April 26 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.