Re:Membership Buyout | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joani Blank (jeblank![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 02:39:58 -0600 |
We (Old Oakland CoHousing, Oakland, CA) have a provision in our LLC (Limited Liability Corporation or Company for those who don't recognize the initials) for what our document calls a Substitute Member, which sounds like what you are asking about. Our attorney used the word Partner at first and we asked him to change it to Member which he did. Since there were still units unsold when Doyle St was all built and mostly lived in, this never came up as an issue. LLC's weren't around in California then--or were very rare, I'm not sure which--So this group was a partnership with the developer as the general partner and the future residents as limited partners. I assume that someone could have sold his/her equity in the partnership to a "substitute" partner, but I don''t know for sure Joani (SF Bay Area)
-
Membership Buyout MicalCedar, March 1 1997
- Re:Membership Buyout Joani Blank, March 3 1997
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.