Re: New Home Developments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diane Simpson (dqs![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 22:32:46 -0600 |
I think it's entirely possible--even desirable--to question the cohousing creed! What's the PURPOSE of cohousing anyhow? It's to live your life in a more sane and humanistic way...sharing the burdens, the joys, the hope, the fears, etcetera etcetera etcera...NOT to become professional housing developers. I like your start on the potential rewording of the "creed"...maybe "Future residents have major input into the site planning" would be good too...anything to take the wording away from "design of homes"...makes it sound too much like a custom-home community (yecchhh!) --Diane:.\ - - - - - - - - - - - - Paul Milne wrote: >.. does it become legitimate to question this "residents design the homes" >pillar of the cohousing creed? Should it be amended? Anyone have a suggested >rewording? "Future residents build elements of communal life into the site"? @@ DQS [at] WORLD.STD.COM @@ @@@@ Diane Simpson http://world.std.com/~dqs @@@@ | | COHOUSING NEXUS | | | "| 263 Chestnut Ave. #1 |" | | V| Boston, MA 02130-4436 617-522-2209 |V | +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Re: New Home Developments, (continued)
- Re: New Home Developments Paul Milne, January 27 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Jasmine Gold, January 27 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Unnat, January 27 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Fred H. Olson, January 27 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Diane Simpson, January 27 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Joani Blank, February 1 1999
- RE: New Home Developments Rob Sandelin, February 1 1999
- Re: New Home Developments Judy Baxter, February 2 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.