RE: Flawed membership process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousemail.msn.com) | |
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 20:57:29 -0500 |
You experienced a competitive situation and it sounds like you did not like it. There are a number of ways to determine membership and one of the most common is who makes out the check first for a downpayment and gets it to the treasurer. This is not always ideal but its pretty clear. Odds are high, you will have turnover sooner than you think, and this will come up again. Are the people who did not get the unit on some kind of waiting list? This situation may come up dozens and dozens of times in a group, and once you have been through it, and learned that people leave and units come avaialable from time to time, you will be able to tell anxious potential members, "Be patient, if you are determined to live here, stay involved in some level and when someone moves on, you can have that unit" The turnover for a 6 home community (did I read that right?) will be much less than a 30 unit community however. I would be interested to understand more about the challenges of the functioning of such a small community. Rob Sandelin Northwest Intentional Communties Association Building a better society, one neighborhood at a time
-
Flawed membership process Fred H. Olson, April 21 1999
- RE: Flawed membership process Rob Sandelin, April 21 1999
- Re: Flawed membership process Elizabeth B. V. Urner, April 30 1999
- Re: Flawed membership process PattyMara, April 30 1999
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.