Re: Problem solving: elevator story | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:12:00 -0600 (MDT) |
Hi Sara, I don't really wish to get right now into an argument over technology, but just wanted to point out that permaculture is *not* new, except by name. There are many examples of its use way before the appearance of Bill Mollison. For good examples read Vandana Shiva's "monocultures of the Mind", "biopiracy" and other books. R. >At 04:41 PM 7/17/02, you wrote: >>In the shorter term: You'd rather run cables all over the planet than >>have a few communications satellites at a tiny fraction of the cost? >>What a waste of copper and glass ... >Exactly. Plus, it's feasible to create a solar power satellite that >could generate a huge amount of power...as in enough for the power use >of all of North America. No more coal or oil burning plants that create >smog, hydroelectric dams that disrupt ecosystems, or nuclear power >plants. I'm sure a solar power satellite would have its own >issues...but there's the principle of **least impact** Individual solar >setups are good, but don't work for everyone. >Plus, the space program has given huge payoffs in terms of advances in >knowledge of medicine and computers, just to name two areas. If NASA >were allowed to collect even a percentage of all the money that has been > generated by its research, it would be one of the few government >agencies that pays for itself **even** with the staggering cost of doing >anything in space. >Humans are tool-using, that is to say technological, creatures; tool use >among hominids is a good bit older than our species, in fact. The >question is, what tools? and how? Low-tech does not equal ecologically >sound; slash-and-burn agriculture is as low-tech as you get. High-tech >does not equal ecologically damaging, either. Permaculture, and indeed >cohousing, are **new** technologies; they are based on older models, >some many thousands of years old, but then so are the latest weapons. >What makes a technology good or bad are the values it expresses, not its >level of sophistication or its relative age. As technological >applications go, the space program...at least the exploring/scientific >aspect of it...is pretty beneficial. >Sara the technopagan... >Never does Nature say one thing and wisdom another. --Juvenal, 50-130 >C.E. >_______________________________________________ >Cohousing-L mailing list >Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: >http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l -- ----------------------------------------------------------- jnpalme [at] attglobal.net (Racheli Gai) ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story, (continued)
-
Re: Problem solving: elevator story Howard Landman, July 16 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Racheli Gai, July 17 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Howard Landman, July 17 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Sara A., July 17 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Racheli Gai, July 18 2002
-
Re: Problem solving: elevator story Howard Landman, July 16 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Gary.Stewart, July 18 2002
- Re: Problem solving: elevator story Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, July 19 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.