Re: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:42:00 -0600 (MDT) |
on 10/15/2002 4:18 AM, Kay Argyle at argyle [at] mines.utah.edu wrote: > My impression (strictly my impression) is that communes tend to be > ideologically driven, and one of the ideologies frequently involves > income-sharing. Cohousing isn't, and doesn't. After all our long winded discussions I think this says it very well. I would also add that cohousing communities have clear legal ownership documents. Communes were often alegal -- not illegal but "outside" the legal structure. Avoiding it as much as possible. Sharon "Trust is built on accountability and transparency." -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Fred H Olson, October 10 2002
-
Re: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Kay Argyle, October 15 2002
- Re: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Sharon Villines, October 15 2002
-
Re: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Kay Argyle, October 15 2002
-
RE: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Forbes Jan, October 15 2002
- RE: Cohousing vs Communes / Affordable / Seattle? Rob Sandelin, October 15 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.