RE: Unit size vs. family size (was Encouraging Multigenerational Community) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:13:56 -0700 (MST) |
Hi Eris, I am looking forward to a beer in your commonhouse someday! (You promised) Could it be that the folks who bought larger units did so because that is what there was and what they wanted was not available? Did they have a real choice? Granted, I am not advocating either way, but I have seen a pattern in many groups that one bedrooms, when available, tended to go to singles or couples and not folks with kids. My friend in Bellevue has a very spacious, 1300 sq foot condo, which has one bedroom. You could convert the office room into another bedroom but it has no built in closet, hence it is a one bedroom unit. So, if you really wanted to, you could build one bedroom units quite large. Empty nesters usually want a GUEST room, for the kids when they come for visits. And many married couples I know without kids have his and hers office spaces. Hence, a space designed as one bedroom, two offices, might be an interesting way to attract childless couples, if that was the goal. My experience is that few couples I know remain childless, thus a one bedroom would not meet their needs and if other options were not available, they would probably move out. But I still think if your goal is to LIMIT couples with children, then one bedroom units will do this for you. There is no guarantee that the two-four bedrooms won't get bought by childless couples or singles, but I took the intent of the poster was to try to architect a certain mixture of couples, families and singles. I wonder what a cohousing group of all one bedroom units would be like? Rob Sandelin Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of erisw Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:44 PM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_Unit size vs. family size (was Encouraging Multigenerational Community) Rob said: > The way you set this up is by the number of bedrooms in your development. > Small, one bedroom units are not attractive to couples with kids. Two and > three+ bedroom units are desirable for families with kids. So, in a thirty > home development you would want to have say 18 or so one bedroom units to > set up the ratios you state that you want. True, one bedroom units are not attractive to couples with kids, but they are often not attractive to couples without kids or even to singles! We ended up not building ANY one bedroom units. It seems that in contemporary America we all feel that we need/want lots of rooms in our houses. In our cohousing community and in our greater community, there seems to be little relationship between unit size and family size. I know single people and childless couples with two or three or even four bedrooms and larger families with one or two. eris _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Unit size vs. family size (was Encouraging Multigenerational Community) erisw, January 28 2003
- RE: Unit size vs. family size (was Encouraging Multigenerational Community) Rob Sandelin, January 29 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.