Re: disruptive members | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (argyle![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:25:02 -0700 (MST) |
There are times when the discreet private conversation to talk about the disruptive behavior meets with denials. Sometimes this is because the person is honestly unaware of the effect their communication style has, and sometimes it's because they enjoy their behavior but won't cop to it (these are the smile and stab you in the back folks). In the former case (not much you can do in the latter), get the person's okay to point out the behavior next time it occurs, right as it occurs. It's important to make the distinction between the style of a communication and its content. If you reject the content because you don't like the style, the problem escalates. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Spring Equinox PattyMara Gourley, March 22 2003
-
disruptive members Kate Nichols, March 24 2003
-
RE: disruptive members Rob Sandelin, March 24 2003
- Re: disruptive members Kay Argyle, March 26 2003
-
RE: disruptive members Rob Sandelin, March 24 2003
-
Re: disruptive members Sharon Villines, March 24 2003
- Re: disruptive members/behavior racheli, March 24 2003
- Re: disruptive members/behavior Elizabeth Stevenson, March 24 2003
- Re: disruptive members/behavior Elizabeth Stevenson, March 24 2003
-
disruptive members Kate Nichols, March 24 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.