Re: Universal Design and Co-housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Hornick (dhornick![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 04:18:01 -0600 (MDT) |
It's good to see attention paid to visitability. It is a good first step. Yet, visitability and useability are two different issues. I'd be interested to know if anyone has employed "Universal Design" principles in co-housing? Universal design is defined (by Ron Mace - now deceased) as "...design of as much of the environment as possible to be as useable as possible by as many people as possible". Universal design provides for adjustments to the living environment to accommodate functional differences and functional change. It enables a person in a wheelchair or a small child to share and function in the same environment as a fully physically functioning adult. A few simple examples: Side by side refrigerator Sink and stovetop whose height adjusts quickly to to all. Wide doorways Light switches at 3 feet height instead of 4 feet or more Large bathrooms and kitchens to accommodate wheelchair turning radius Shower rooms instead of shower stalls or bathtub showers "Smart Home" technology Landscaping that substitutes gentle slopes for steps. Lighting that is as friendly to aged eyes as to younger eyes. It is these design considerations that permit people to remain in their homes despite changes in functional capacity. Universal Design done well permits multifunctional families to function together in a shared living space. If Universal Design were applied to all housing, every house would be useable to most people regardless of functional status. If universal design has not penetrated the co-housing movement, why not? David Hornick > > Jill, > You may add Cambridge Cohousing (MA) to your list. > > Of our 41 units, all but 4 are visitable by someone in a wheelchair or > scooter. The additional 4 units (stack flats) are visitable if the person > can use a stairchair. 12 units are townhouses in which each 1st floor is > visitable. All other flats and most common areas are in our common house > serviced by an elevator. All common spaces are accessible to all. > > Peg Blum > > pegb [at] cambridgecohousing.org > http://www.cambridgecohousing.org > > >> >> From what I've seen, there is not much access at most cohos. >> > >> East Lake Commons in Atlanta, >> Swan Market in Oakland. >> Takoma Village in DC, and >> Cornerstone in Boston. >> >> Eno Commons in Durham has a few accessible units and one level of the >> common house is accessible. >> >> I hope others will post additions to the list of accessible cohos >> (meaning access to all common spaces and visitability in all units) . >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing, (continued)
-
Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jill Robinson, June 15 2003
-
Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Peg Blum, June 15 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jim Snyder-Grant, June 15 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Joani Blank, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing David Hornick, June 16 2003
- RE: Universal Design and Co-housing Rodney Elin, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Catya Belfer-Shevett, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jill Robinson, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Racheli Gai, June 16 2003
-
Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Peg Blum, June 15 2003
-
Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jill Robinson, June 15 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.