Re: Re: Work Sharing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Cheryl Charis-Graves (ccharis![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:08:06 -0600 (MDT) |
On 8/23/03 7:40 AM, "Sharon Villines" <sharon [at] sharonvillines.us> wrote: > One of the consistent problems I see with meetings is that people do not > come prepared and do no work between meetings. > In majority rule, the majority can just ignore people who arrive unprepared. > In consensus, one can't. But the problem is still people arriving > unprepared, not consensus. Sharon, I think you nailed this one. While meetings are not "fun," it is a pleasure to be part of a meeting in which people are prepared, have done the work they agreed to, and the energy of those present is engaged in the "work" of the meeting. I do wonder. The people who come to meetings unprepared and don't find time for doing the work in between meetings also speak of their frustration (and their guilt). They do care, but ... Reasons given include demands of family life, too busy with professional work, commitments to friends/extended family/organizations, commitments to a personal passion (that does not occur in meetings), and the ubiquitous differences in personality/style. I'm also thinking consensus is more than a form we adhere to, but an agreement about the way in which we consider the group, attempting to balance needs of the person and needs of the comm'ty. It makes things more complex. It's more demanding. But it doesn't always look like people sitting in chairs at a meeting. It might take the form of a written proposal on the bulletin board from one comm'ty member re a private daycare venture, an ad hoc group talking over drinks on the patio to refine a work/pay proposal, an elist summary of work-in-progress on repair of the carport lighting, or a one-on-one dialogue between a comm'ty member and a "coordinating council" representative on a sofa in the basement after watching big screen TV. I'd like to release those people who don't function as well in the meeting structure from their frustration and guilt while also finding a way in which they can contribute based on needs, abilities, and resources. It does take all of us, but it needn't look the same for everyone. It's part of the growth process, I think, which is an inherent part of any group/relationship. -- Cheryl Charis-Graves Harmony Village Cohousing Golden, Colorado http://www.harmonyvillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Work Sharing Sharon Villines, September 8 1999
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
-
Re: Re: Work Sharing Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Cheryl Charis-Graves, August 23 2003
-
Re: Re: Work Sharing Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Berrins, August 23 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.