Re: replacement reserves | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:29:00 -0500 |
On 4/6/04 7:25 PM, "don i arkin" <shardon5 [at] juno.com> wrote: > We did not > budget for items that would last at least 30 years from the date of the > study. One assumption made by the professionals was that replacement of > buildings, typically more than 50 years away, were beyond the "useful > life of the project" and could thus be ignored entirely. What???? Meaning the place will fall down by then? Is this short term thinking or what? Surely this is a mistake? Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
replacement reserves Don Arkin, April 7 2004
- Re: replacement reserves Sharon Villines, April 7 2004
- Re: replacement reserves Elizabeth Stevenson, April 7 2004
- Re: replacement reserves Howard Landman, April 7 2004
-
Replacement reserves Harriet Lewis, April 8 2004
- Re: Replacement reserves Elizabeth Stevenson, April 8 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.