Re: work allocation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (rachelisonoracohousing.com) | |
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:50:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Adi wrote (in part):"I do think we are on the extreme end of the quantified/organized scale, but it
is also much easier to explain and discuss when everyone has a currency(hours) that is universally tangible. I wish we didn't have to do all this since it introduces an organzational overhead, and I would love to believe that 60 adults could just make it all work on unwritten/untracked good faith,
but the examples where that works seem rare." I live in Sonora Cohousing, where the community was always split on this issue. Some would like specific hours assigned etc., and others believe that letting people do what they believe is useful/ necessary (among the various tasks defined by the community) is a better way to go.It's interesting to note that people who'd like strict structure don't seem
to think that things are working out fine without them, while those ofus who like the voluntary approach also seem to think that it's really working
fine... Racheli.
- work allocation [was Re: how many people for common meal...just starting], (continued)
- work allocation [was Re: how many people for common meal...just starting] R.P. Aditya, August 10 2006
- Re: work allocation [was Re: how many people for common meal...just starting] Sharon Villines, August 10 2006
- Re: work allocation [was Re: how many people for common meal...just starting] R.P. Aditya, August 10 2006
- Service to your community vs work Rob Sandelin, August 10 2006
- Re: work allocation Racheli Gai, August 10 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.