Re: marketing question / right of first refusal | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (kay.argyle![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:59:41 -0700 (PDT) |
Wasatch Commons' bylaws also contain a right of first refusal. The community is leaning towards the conclusion that the disadvantages (not qualifying for VA loans etc.) outweigh any advantages, although we haven't decided if it is worth the expense of modifying the bylaws (lawyers etc.) to get rid of it. The community would have trouble coming up with the money to buy a unit if it did decide to exercise the clause. The community helps sellers with marketing. Some residents have expressed sentiments similar to yours, that it should be the seller's responsibility. This overlooks the consequences to the community. (It is also symptomatic of the rugged individualist, every-man-for-himself mentality that cohousing is a reaction to, but never mind.) We've had enough experience with units that were sold to people without adequate orientation - and ended up back on the market a year later - or that sold only because, after a year on the market, another resident bought it and the welcoming committee found them a tenant, that marketing is now a standard part of our budget. For some folks, the concept of cohousing has to percolate, sometimes for years, before they are ready to take the plunge. Thus some of the most effective marketing is about maintaining visibility, rather than selling a particular unit. We have permanent ads in local alternative publications. We provide a venue for community council meetings, meet-the-candidate nights, and permaculture short courses. We rent booths at neighborhood fairs. We wangle write-ups in the local paper. This sort of sustained effort is unlikely except on a community level. If it's left totally up to the seller, the best-case scenario is usually that they waste time and effort on the normal real estate marketing methods - both their time and that of most of the prospects generated by those methods. (Although a real estate agent we worked with near the end of construction did steer a buyer our way - seven years later.) If you've got a marketing committee, over time they learn what works. The worst-case scenario is that the seller just wants out, or even is actively hostile, and doesn't care if s/he sells the house to someone who will be horrified to find themselves in a nest of commie-pinko fag-loving flag-burning can-recycling recumbent-riding, omigod DEMOCRATS. (We've run into a few people in the neighborhood who would have been more welcoming if we'd been the fundamentalist polygamy cult that was first assumed.) When a unit is slow to sell, often the seller continues living in the unit but not really in the community. They don't attend meetings or meals. Their emotional absence becomes an uneasy presence in its own right. We've tried it both ways, and we've been happier with the results we get from community marketing. Kay
- Re: marketing question, (continued)
- Re: marketing question Stuart Joseph, July 18 2007
- Re: marketing question Robert Heinich, July 18 2007
-
Re: marketing question / right of first refusal Raines Cohen, July 19 2007
- Re: marketing question / right of first refusal Lyle Scheer, July 19 2007
- Re: marketing question / right of first refusal Kay Argyle, July 19 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.