| Re: Changing common elements | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb |
|
| Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT) | |
normangauss [at] charter.net wrote:
> All changes to the property need to be legally consistent. That is
> why we have Common Interest Development Law, CC&R's and Bylaws. If
> we did not have that, an individuals equity could be refined just
> because enough people decided so.
If you find a change truly intolerable, then block it. If your block
is overruled by a majority vote, then you're functioning in a majority
rule system, and 'life, liberty, and property is not safe when the
legislature is in session'.
Becky Weaver's advice is extremely valuable for effective politicking
in a majority rule system.
Brian
-
Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 maura deering, September 20 2007
- Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
-
Changing common elements Rob Sandelin, September 20 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Brian Bartholomew, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Catya Belfer-Shevett, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Sharon Villines, September 21 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.