Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:34:14 -0800 (PST) |
On Jan 8, 2008, at 3:40 PM, katie-henry [at] att.net wrote:
Conventional cohousing wisdom says that you should have cars on the periphery and funnel foot traffic into the CH to maximize interaction. In this building, people could (and probably would) take the elevator from the parking garage directly to their unit floor and bypass the CH entirely. Would people tend to use the CH if it were up on the roof? Is this a bad idea?
Personally, I think if people are going to use the commonhouse they are going to use the commonhouse. It would be good to have an area on the first floor near the mailboxes where people can chat when they meet to pick up their mail -- analogous the the water cooler in an office.
Especially if the commohouse has spectacular views and if there is a playground up there like the one at Eastern Village, people will go up there. If they don't, you can stock it with cookies and beer.
Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing,Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? katie-henry, January 8 2008
- Message not available
-
Cohousing Bank Account? balaji, January 8 2008
- Re: Cohousing Bank Account? Sharon Villines, January 8 2008
-
Cohousing Bank Account? balaji, January 8 2008
- Message not available
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Sharon Villines, January 8 2008
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Fred H Olson, January 9 2008
-
Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Joani Blank, January 10 2008
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Sharon Villines, January 10 2008
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Alexander Robin A, January 10 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.