Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bob Morrison (RHmorrisonaol.com) | |
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:41:20 -0800 (PST) |
Joani Blank wrote in part: As for getting people to use the CH, yes, put the mail boxes up there, and not right next to the elevator. The group may have to work something out with the post office to get them to deliver the mail knowing that it's going to be further distributed before being delivered to the intended recipient. Or you could just not tell them the P.O, and trust someone in your group to remove the mail from the conventional "boxes" where they are delivered now and distribute it to people's boxes upstairs. [end quote] I would be uneasy about the USPS delivering mail to a master mailbox and someone in the group distributing it to per-unit mailboxes. This would be a lot of work, and he/she would have to do it on time six days a week. There is also a privacy issue. I think the only practical way to do it would be to put the mailroom, including a conversation area, on the first floor and relying on things other than picking up mail to draw people to the rooftop CH. Bob Morrison Dover, NH
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof?, (continued)
-
Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Alexander Robin A, January 10 2008
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Sharon Villines, January 10 2008
- Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Kay Argyle, January 15 2008
- Common house-temperature Laura Fitch, January 16 2008
-
Re: Urban cohousing: Common house on roof? Alexander Robin A, January 10 2008
-
Mail [ was Urban cohousing: Common house on roof?] Sharon Villines, January 11 2008
- Snail mail privacy Brian Bartholomew, January 11 2008
- Re: Snail mail privacy Raines Cohen, January 13 2008
- Re: Snail mail privacy Sharon Villines, January 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.