Re: Looking for advice about enhancing our Friends policy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Eris Weaver (eris![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:38:18 -0800 (PST) |
Jonnie Pekelny wrote: > I'd love to hear stories of Friends networks that work. How do you > get Friends involved in your community? How much access to community > forums/mailing lists, whatever, do you give them, and how do you > keep those lists active? To which Sharon Villines replied: > I think at some point you have to get the everyone to fish or cut > bait. Eris speaking now. <soapbox on> I think it is VERY important to think/discuss/agree about the PURPOSE of your Friends network, Associate Membership policy, etc. I personally think the primary purpose should be to give new folks a chance to "try on" the community on their way to becoming full members. There still needs to be some sort of financial buy-in, and there should be some limits on their decision-making participation. It may also be useful to have a time limit, as to how long folks can be Friends/Associates before they fish or cut bait, e.g. become full members or leave. You don't want folks who are never going to move in to suck energy from the group, influence decisions under which they will never live, etc. During my own community's forming & developing stages, we had a two-tiered structure - Full & Associate members. There were members who wanted a third Friends category (although we called it something else, I can't quite remember what). These were the friends, supporters, folks who wanted to be involved in social events, etc. Some folks still think we should have a more formal structure now for folks like this (including "alumni" who have lived here but don't anymore). We never went there, I think because nobody could satisfactorily answer this question: How would having this category of membership SERVE OUR COMMUNITY? Will it make our job of getting this place built easier or happier? Will it help us to function better? Sure, cohousers are cool people and lots of our friends like to hang out on our fringes - we welcome them to some social functions, especially when they bring good food & drinks<grin>. But when you are in the phase of working your butts off, investing your life savings, making big decisions about how you are going to live together - you don't want to waste time and energy trying to somehow meet the needs/wants of folks who aren't going to ever be a part of that. I think part of what happens here is that we are all idealistic people and we don't just want a nice place for ourselves to live, we want to change the world…so we think we have to be all things to all people who are interested in hanging out with us. But we can't do everything at once, and while we are spending all of our resources finding land, designing, building, etc. we really need to take care of ourselves and focus on getting the current work done without distractions. <soapbox off> ------------------------------ Eris Weaver, Facilitator & Group Process Consultant eris [at] erisweaver.info 707-338-8589 http://www.erisweaver.info fa cil' i tāt: to make easier
-
Looking for advice about enhancing our Friends policy Jonnie Pekelny, January 21 2008
- Re: Looking for advice about enhancing our Friends policy Rob Sandelin, January 21 2008
- Re: Looking for advice about enhancing our Friends policy Sharon Villines, January 22 2008
- Re: Looking for advice about enhancing our Friends policy Eris Weaver, January 22 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.