| Re: Low cost housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb |
|
| Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT) | |
| 'I'm not investing $XXXK over YY years to live next to a Katrina
| cottage.'
> This is why I think low cost cohousing has to be built with the
> whole community as low cost housing because in the end it affects
> resale values to have a $350,000 house next to a $60,000 house, no
> matter how nice it is.
Why would a lower priced house affect resale values? Oh. One of
*them* moved in. There goes the neighborhood. Have you see the
organic gardening cohouser at the end of the block? I heard they're
building a straw bale house. Ewwww!! Quick, call the sheriff to run
them off. We don't want their kind here.
The goal of laws which ban low-cost housing is to prevent *them* from
moving in. Zoning is a violation of civil rights, both in intent and
in practical effect. The phrase "affects resale values" admits there
is prejudice in society. We shouldn't enshrine prejudice in law.
-----
> Since most people who buy homes that expensive are also carrying
> huge mortgages. They can't afford a home that is worth less than the
> mortgage, even if the bank loans them money for it in the first place.
Everyone involved is an adult. Homeowners are at liberty to buy a
loan with a high debt to income ratio, and they are free to lose their
equity if they can't make the payments.
Brian
- Low cost housing, (continued)
-
Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing James Kacki, May 13 2008
-
Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Sharon Villines, May 13 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Bruce Shimizu, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Mark Harfenist, May 14 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 15 2008
- Re: Low cost housing Matthew Whiting, May 15 2008
-
Low cost housing Brian Bartholomew, May 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.