Re: Consensus decision making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (rachelisonoracohousing.com) | |
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:30:00 -0700 (PDT) |
It seems to me to be important to define what is meant by the term
"effective":
Is an effective community one which makes decision fast? Is it one wheredecisions, once reached, are embraced by the whole community and therefore
are carried out effectively, or? ...I think that a high level of trust is a precondition for high level of delegation (so that decision are seen as supporting the whole community, not this or that
faction). If this is missing, delegating becomes very problematic. Racheli (Sonora Cohousing, Tucson). On Aug 4, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Craig Ragland wrote:
Here Here Joani! My opinion is that more effective cohousing groups using consensus dodelegate LOTS of decision-making - especially ones requiring detailed study and understanding. I believe a common misunderstanding about consensus isthat ALL decisions MUST involve EVERYBODY in decision-making process.When individuals and sub-groups are appropriately empowered, they increase their effectiveness as they create plans that are both (1) consistent with their mandate and (2) that truly serve the broader group - including thosewith minority views. Craig On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Joani Blank <joani [at] swansway.com> wrote:Friends, Here's part of an email exchange I had with Tim Mensch about his recent post on this subject: A good agenda or steering committee will only put on the table/agenda for general community meetings, items of some significance that really need community buy-in to be effective. In the example you gave (leaky roof damaging some of the common property), a committee (Maintenance, perhaps) can have blanket authorization in advance to arrange a repair in such an emergency. Here at Swan's Market Cohousing (Oakland, CA), individuals and committees are authorized (by consensus) to make decisions about all manner of things after there has been an opportunity in the general community meeting for a variety of views on the proposal to be presented, and sometimes a straw vote to get the "sense of the meeting." This seems to work fine, giving everyone who has an opinion, a chance to have their say on the matter (and to be respectfully heard), and not tying the whole community up on matters where it really doesn't matter if one or two people object, even strongly object, to what will probably be the decision made by the individual or committee that's been authorized to make that decision. Joani Joani Blank land line : 510-834-7399 (preferred) cell: 510-387-1315 Swan's Market Cohousing.P Save Trees ...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to._________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/-- Craig Ragland Coho/US executive director http://www.cohousing.org craig [at] cohousing.orgPlease try email first, include your phone number (w/time zone) - or give mea call: 425-487-3550 (Pacific)... communicate! _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Consensus decision making with and without a voting override provision Joani Blank, August 4 2008
-
Re: Consensus decision making with and without a voting override provision Craig Ragland, August 4 2008
- Re: Consensus decision making Racheli Gai, August 5 2008
- Delegating desion making Rob Sandelin, August 5 2008
- Re: Consensus decision making Sharon Villines, August 5 2008
- Re: Consensus decision making Sharon Villines, August 5 2008
- Re: Consensus decision making balaji, August 6 2008
-
Re: Consensus decision making with and without a voting override provision Craig Ragland, August 4 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.