Re: Non-standardized houses? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:27:08 -0700 (PDT) |
Bruce Mckinney wrote about the lot development model and said that: "I've heard over and over that standardization is a way to cut costs." One of the advantages of the lot development model is that people can build their own home, with their own money, smaller than what banks will allow. For example you build a shell, and then finish it over a couple of years. Or you can build a 12 X 12ft house out of recycled wood, then add on to it over time. The cost depends ultimately what you choose to build and how fussy the group is about such things. I did about half the contracting on my home, did much of the finishing work myself and got a very usable house at a very reasonable and affordable cost. But it was not finished for three years. The lot model allows individuals to choose what they build so there can be a wide diversity of styles and costs. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood Cohousing 27 homes on 40 acres -
- Re: Non-standardized houses?, (continued)
-
Re: Non-standardized houses? Raines Cohen, August 26 2008
- Re: Non-standardized houses? Robert Heinich, August 27 2008
- meeting nonstandard needs (was Non-standardized houses?) Kay Argyle, August 27 2008
-
Non-standardized houses? Bruce McKinney, August 27 2008
- Re: Non-standardized houses? Rob Sandelin, August 30 2008
-
Re: Non-standardized houses? Raines Cohen, August 26 2008
-
Re: Non-standardized houses? Joelyn Malone, August 27 2008
-
Re: competing special needs Joanie Connors, August 28 2008
- Re: competing special needs melanie griffin, August 28 2008
- Re: competing special needs Sharon Villines, August 28 2008
-
Re: competing special needs Joanie Connors, August 28 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.