|Re: cohousing vision||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Jerome Garciano (jlgebox-04yahoo.com)|
|Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:31:16 -0700 (PDT)|
I agree with much of what Ann and John have written below. If anyone is interested in joining a very exciting planning group that is focused on this issue of affordable and rental cohousing, please contact me. We have a lot of energy and vision coming out of the CoHo/US conference and are moving in concrete steps toward establishing organizational infrastructure, ownership mechanism and financing/capitalization vehicles for affordable and rental cohousing. Also, I have written an article about affordable cohousing to be published in the Winter 2011 edition of the American Bar Association's Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law. If you are interested in receiving a copy, email me and I will forward you a PDF of it. *Jerome L. Garciano, Esq.* Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199 Direct Dial: 617.239.0285 Direct Fax: 888.325.9042 Main Dial: 617.239.0100 www.eapdlaw.com On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:43 AM, John Beutler <jabeutler [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > In the US, housing cooperatives have been an option in some states, but in > others the coop laws have made that approach undesirable. In states with > favorable laws such as New York, housing coops have provided some of the > starkest instances of exclusivity, elitism and racism in the housing market. > Simple rental may provide a more feasible approach for cohousing if a method > of capitalization can be developed. > > Cheers > > JAB > > Sent from my tricorder > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 3:47 AM, peterpiper [at] riseup.net wrote: > > > > > Writing from the UK. > > > > Cohoousing will remain exclusive while it is based mainly on owner > > occupation. Many people can't afford to buy into cohousing in the USA or > > UK. And it seems cruel that the nicer a place it gets, the more > > exclusive the move-in price becomes. > > > > That is why our new cohousing project (www.lilac.coop) is a Mutual Home > > Ownership Society. Residents don't rent or buy. Rather we finance equity > > shares in the co-operative with 35% of our income. Whilst there is a > > minimum income required to become a member, it is possible for over > > three quarters of the UK population. When we move on we get to cash in > > our equity shares. > > > > Frankly we didn't want to live with just with rich people. We wanted a > > mix. So the Mutual Home Ownership Society is a good way for us to ensure > > diversity, and that our cohousing is affordable FOREVER. > > > > We starting building on site in a couple of months. Come and visit in > 2013! > > > > Alan > > > > Ann Maria Bell wrote: > >> > >> So long as cohousing communities are based on home-ownership they will > be > >> "middle class" by definition. Here at Arboretum Cohousing 100% of our > homes > >> are owner-occupied. In fact, as a result of negotiations with the > >> neighborhood& city during the development process the community has > >> restrictions on how many units can be rented out, even temporarily. We > have > >> a small number of people renting rooms, 2-3 typically. I have always > felt > >> that the lack of rental options is the primary impediment to greater > >> diversity in cohousing. At its highest, the home ownership rate in the > US > >> was about 60%. That means that 40% of the population is eliminated from > the > >> pool of potential cohousers from the start, including the poor& most > young > >> adults. > >> > >> Six of the 40 homes at Arbco were low-income units subsidized in part by > >> grants and in part by the community. People of color make up about 10% > of > >> our residents. We have 3 disabled young adults, 2 of whom require full > time > >> attendants. We have nurses& health care workers, professors, state > workers, > >> IT people, teachers, a couple of lawyers (retired), a few grad students, > a > >> few people working in retail/service jobs, 2 graphic artists, a police > >> officer, a community organizer, a social worker, and a fair number of > >> retired people, children, and stay-at-home parents. Some are solidly > "middle > >> class," others tenuously "middle class," and though it's a bit hard to > tell, > >> probably no one is in the upper "middle class." About 8-10 people are > union > >> members. > >> > >> During our opening celebration one of our founders quipped, "We are > young& > >> old, black& white, gay& straight, Democrats&... Democrats."(With all > of > >> the political turmoil in Wisconsin right now we have discovered that "we > are > >> democrats& radicals" might be a more apt description.) As for other > values, > >> of course we share a good bit in common. > >> > >> So are we all just a bunch of middle class liberals living in a liberal > >> city? Have we brought "middle class culture, its beliefs, mores, values, > >> customs, rituals, taboos and lifestyles (often including materialism)" > with > >> us? Are we just looking for more of what we already have? Honestly, I > don't > >> know. > >> > >> I think that whether cohousing is just Neighborhood 2.0 or a more > intense > >> experience of community depends on what individual people decide to do. > If > >> your main interest is attending the occasional community event or > workday > >> and participating at member meetings, that's what you do. If you're more > >> interested in community you spend more time in the common areas, go to > more > >> community meals,& devote more of your time to interacting with other > >> community members. Arbco is a relatively large community (~80 people) > and we > >> have lots of people all along the spectrum of participation and > involvement. > >> You get what you give. > >> > >> Given the first point I made about home ownership, it seems highly > unlikely > >> that we'll have any kind of cohousing "revolution" that fundamentally > >> transforms society. Cohousing is one narrow form of community embedded > in a > >> much larger, more diverse society. > >> > >> For me, I've found it more helpful to keep my expectations of what > >> "community" and "cohousing" should be to a minimum. I knew before I > moved in > >> that I wanted to have community meals (it's turned out to be 2x week, > plus 1 > >> potluck). I expected a lot of meetings, and yup, there are a lot of > >> meetings. After that, well, we're all in this together and who knows > what > >> we'll come up with as a community. Arbco doesn't have a sports team, or > its > >> own medical system, but we have cranked out& given away over 20,000 > buttons > >> since we got a button making machine in February -- who could have > predicted > >> that? > >> > >> Peace out ; ) > >> Ann > >> > >> > >> Ann Maria Bell > >> Arboretum Cohousing > >> Madison WI > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >> > >> > >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: cohousing vision, (continued)
- Re: cohousing vision Ann Maria Bell, July 7 2011
- Re: cohousing vision Sharon Villines, July 13 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.