Re: Blocking frivolously
From: Racheli Gai (rachelisonoracohousing.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
I completely agree with the observation that in consensus there shouldn't be more than one proposal on the table at any one tim Since we had workshops with CT Butler we don't do things this way, but the example is from a time when there was no common understanding what working by consensus means.

Racheli.




On 10/03/2011 07:49 AM, Eris Weaver wrote:
An example of frivolous blocking:
At some point, there was a proposal to raise our association dues by
roughly $5 per household, and an alternative proposal not to raise it.
Offering proposal A and completely opposite proposal B = VOTING and not
consensus.

In consensus, the default if a proposal does not achieve consensus is...the
status quo. So if the proposal is to change something (raise dues $5) and it
cannot be accepted, the status quo (current dues) remains in place.


------------------------------
Eris Weaver, Facilitator&  Group Process Consultant
Author, "Let's Talk About Money: A Conversation Guide for Intentional
Communities"
eris [at] erisweaver.info
707-338-8589
http://www.erisweaver.info
http://erisweaver.blogspot.com


fa cil' i tāt: to make easier





_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.