Re: Blocking frivolously | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT) |
I completely agree with the observation that in consensus there
shouldn't be more than one proposal on the table at any one tim Since
we had workshops with CT Butler we don't do things this way, but the
example is from a time when there was no common understanding what
working by consensus means.
Racheli. On 10/03/2011 07:49 AM, Eris Weaver wrote:
An example of frivolous blocking: At some point, there was a proposal to raise our association dues by roughly $5 per household, and an alternative proposal not to raise it.Offering proposal A and completely opposite proposal B = VOTING and not consensus. In consensus, the default if a proposal does not achieve consensus is...the status quo. So if the proposal is to change something (raise dues $5) and it cannot be accepted, the status quo (current dues) remains in place. ------------------------------ Eris Weaver, Facilitator& Group Process Consultant Author, "Let's Talk About Money: A Conversation Guide for Intentional Communities" eris [at] erisweaver.info 707-338-8589 http://www.erisweaver.info http://erisweaver.blogspot.com fa cil' i tāt: to make easier _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Re: Blocking frivolously Eris Weaver, October 3 2011
- Re: Blocking frivolously Racheli Gai, October 3 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.