Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT) |
On 20 Oct 2011, at 12:31 PM, R Philip Dowds wrote: > > Maybe a "block" is better understood as an "objection that cannot be resolved > within the knowledge, skill, time, and patience available to the group". > I've certainly seen a bunch of those. I think that sounds good. We recently proposed consent as being based on this solution being the "best that can be achieved at this time" but some objected to it because some people in the room will think a better solution could be achieved — usually with more time. This phrasing would be better. Sharon.
-
Allowing "block" creates vetoes Sharon Villines, October 20 2011
-
Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes R Philip Dowds, October 20 2011
- Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes Sharon Villines, October 25 2011
-
Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes R Philip Dowds, October 20 2011
-
Allowing "block" creates vetoes Brian Tremback, October 21 2011
- Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes R Philip Dowds, October 23 2011
- Re: Allowing "block" creates vetoes Sharon Villines, October 25 2011
- Allowing "block" creates vetoes Brian Tremback, October 25 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.