Re: Smoking Policies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Thomas Lofft (tloffthotmail.com) | |
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:35:59 -0800 (PST) |
It was written: "The down side of this [non-smoking] policy is it somewhat limits the pool of potential people who will buy into your community, but as smoking becomes increasingly unpopular and uncommon this becomes less and less of a meaningful issue." I think this is the least important reason of all for not adopting non-smoking [or other healthy communitarian] policies. If you don't want predators, face the facts: these are your values and don't need to be defended. If you don't want to accept their lifestyle, I highly doubt you want to encourage them to buy the home next door. Even if they are your parents or other relatives, no community has any obligation to accept a compromise of its principles by anyone. Tom Lofft Liberty Village, MD
- Re: Smoking Policies, (continued)
- Re: Smoking Policies R Philip Dowds, November 21 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Kay Argyle, November 23 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Richard L. Kohlhaas, November 21 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Timothy Hunter, November 21 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Thomas Lofft, November 21 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Diana Carroll, November 21 2011
-
Smoking Policies Thomas Lofft, November 22 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies R Philip Dowds, November 23 2011
- Re: Smoking Policies Sharon Villines, November 23 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.