Re: Designing gathering spaces | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Nancy Baumeister (nancybee![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT) |
On 4/24/2012 8:06 PM, Nessa Dertnig wrote:
I would go with the minimal. It is very hard to take something away once people get used to an idea of how things are. If you all can agree on minimal yards now with later refinement then I think that is OK for now.I guess I'm still trying to get clear on whether everyone out there in coho land thinks this issue is pressing enough to warrant being tackled immediately, or if it's okay to give everyone a very minimal yard for now (5-10 feet in front and behind their house)
Our approach was to put minimal outdoor space into the deeds (we are organized as a condo in townhouses and flats) and respond to individual requests/needs as they came up. We have ended up giving management (effective ownership within some agreed upon policies) of the sides of the buildings to the people living on the ends of each building. And we originally had thought to have some land along the central path that would be landscaped with the same palette of plants to give us a cohesive feel. Well, that didn't work so we just gave that space to the people who live in front of it. Soi the evolution has been towards individual control rather than community management.
So at this point the land directly around the buildings is effectively under individual control. Everything else is managed by the community.
Before move-in we had a landscape architect (working with a team of members) design a landscape plan. At this point (4 years later) we are realizing that some parts of that plan don't work for us, some parts are too fuzzy to be useful, and some parts need more careful definition. So we are starting a long slow process of re-examining everything. There are 24 different interest areas which have from 2 to 15 people interested in designing them- the results will go to a meeting for communiy approval. I expect the process will take more than a year.
One of the things I have learned living in cohousing is how different people are from each other. Peoples needs around land are very different. Some people will come with a lot of outdoor stuff (that was me). Some people are perfectly happy with a little 3x5 foot strip to plant flowers in . They don't want and won't care for a larger area..
I have also learned that the period right after move-in is not normal. People are new and they don't know yet how to set up their situation so that it works well for them. So flexibility and a period of adjustment is needed.
Bottom line
Would anyone out there advocate the more laissez-faire approach of letting things be fuzzy and uncertain for a while, or do most of you agree that it's much better to get things defined beforehand? Some of our group wonders about possible conflicts later -- even if you say things are temporary for this year, it seems there will inevitably be problems getting people to give up things later. How do you work with this kind of thing? Also, has anyone heard of a community where yards are not defined at all, and how this has worked or not worked? Take care, Nessa Message: 4 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:20:31 -0500 From: Jerry McIntire<jerry.mcintire [at] gmail.com> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Subject: Designing gathering spaces To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Message-ID: <CA+rotZNccpkwg4WJ3twSC8kK9OTvggR-MEZETYXba7xekmv2Wg [at] mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Nessa, Congratulations to you and everyone at Belfast on your imminent move-in! I hope to visit you in June because of your similarities to our situation: small town ecovillage with a commitment to affordable housing. Regarding common and private spaces outside the homes, I think deciding ahead of time how much yard an owner will be able to use privately would be an important decision to make before move-in. In fact, it is such an integral part of the value of a home, I can't imagine arriving at a price without having that space defined. As Sharon has pointed out, access for other members passing by, for lawnmowers, etc. all need to be considered. I would have thought that gathering places too would have been designed as part of site planning, before any construction began. Of course, these are my *assumptions*. Since you have people moving in over the course of a year or more, I would think that deciding now, before a minority start making de facto decisions because they're living on site first, is important. All the best, Jerry _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-- Nancy Baumeister CoHoEcovillage.org www.flickr.com/photos/nancybeetoo/tags/ "Let's have a moment of silence for all those Americans who are stuck in traffic on their way to the gym to ride the stationary bicycle." -- U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.)
- Re: Designing gathering spaces, (continued)
-
Re: Designing gathering spaces Nessa Dertnig, April 24 2012
- Re: Designing gathering spaces Elizabeth Magill, April 25 2012
- Re: Designing gathering spaces Sharon Villines, April 25 2012
-
Re: Designing gathering spaces Nessa Dertnig, April 24 2012
- Re: Designing gathering spaces Nancy Baumeister, April 25 2012
-
Re: Designing gathering spaces Nessa Dertnig, April 24 2012
- Re: Designing gathering spaces Nessa Dertnig, April 28 2012
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.