Re: Quorum | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 05:52:08 -0700 (PDT) |
On May 13, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Mabel Liang <mabel [at] twomeeps.com> wrote: > Interesting! What's your "posted for objections" process? Particularly > the time frame? We don't have a specific policy on this related to meetings. Our decision-making policy allows posting for objections for certain kinds of decisions -- like under a certain amount and within a team's budget. We have extended this to decisions in meetings that need further review. One area is the wording on policies. Rather than wordsmith in meetings or bringing it back to another meeting, someone does the wording and posts it on email for objections. The time for response is usually a week, sometimes four days. What is a minor change in a proposal is certainly a matter of judgement but in general it is one that changes a condition or detail, not the major thrust. Often clarifying wording that might have been misunderstood or not understood at all. On other decisions it could be shorter. The facilities team just decided to replace a new security door on one of the corridors and gave 24 hours notice as an emergency decision. They had just learned that the door couldn't be fixed and it had to be replaced since it is a security door. In sociocracy, the goal is the best decision. If someone who was not at a meeting has information after consent has been achieved at a meeting, the decision would be revisited. The issue is the _substance_ of the decision, not the process. If you are working off information and measurements rather than SWAG or preferences, this is easier to determine. In several contexts lately it has become clear that all of us white collar workers have drifted to thinking meetings are the work. Meetings are not the work. The work is what you do when you walk out the door. Meetings are work because you are making a decision and decisions are hard, but the meetings are about what happens outside the meeting, not the meeting process. That shift in thinking makes it easier to avoid the focus on excessive detailing of process. If it's an incomplete or bad policy decision, it needs to be revisited whether the proper process was followed or not. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Quorum, (continued)
- Re: Quorum Sharon Villines, May 13 2013
- Re: Quorum Elizabeth Magill, May 13 2013
- Re: Quorum Sharon Villines, May 13 2013
- Re: Quorum Mabel Liang, May 13 2013
- Re: Quorum Sharon Villines, May 15 2013
- Re: Quorum Sharon Villines, May 13 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.