Re: decision-making process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ann Zabaldo (zabaldo![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:21:53 -0700 (PDT) |
Rick! I really love this! An excellent guide for evaluating one’s decision making process. Altho’ how do you measure #1 “strengthen relationship” and #2 respect or improve the decision-making process? I guess number 2 might be measured by the length of time it takes from proposal to decision, the number of drafts, the number of meetings, the number of concerns or objections to be resolved. Hmm. I don’t know that these would be the measures but yes. #2 could be more easily measured. But how to measure/evaluate #1? Fewer fist-fights? :-) In any event … I do love where you are coming from in looking at decision-making and its role in building community. Thank you! Best -- Ann Zabaldo Takoma Village Cohousing Washington, DC Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC Falls Church VA 703-688-2646 On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Richart Keller <richart.keller [at] gmail.com> wrote: > The quality of decisions is one indicator of community success. I.e. the > measure of a successful decision is the extent to which it meets 3 tests: > does it > 1) achieve the desired result, 2) strengthen relationships within the > group, and 3) does it respect or improve the decision-making process? > > Rick > > Sent from my droid. > On Sep 18, 2014 6:12 PM, "Eris Weaver" <eris [at] erisweaver.info> wrote: > >> >> Thanks, Rick, for the shout-out! >> >> Yes, most cohousing communities use consensus for the plenary decision >> making. I highly recommend that groups get TRAINING in consensus, whether >> it's from me or Tree or Laird or whoever else. It takes learning, >> commitment, and practice to use it well. Also, there are several different >> "flavors" of consensus and it is helpful, in the consensus training, to >> work >> out exactly how YOUR community is going to use and interpret several >> components of consensus. >> >> Even groups that use consensus for most big things may use other >> decision-making methods for some kinds of decisions. Consensus, while a >> wonderful, deep, connecting tool, is not the ONLY tool, and is not >> appropriate for every group, need or situation. (This has been one of MY >> big >> learnings over the years.) To expand on this would take more time than I >> have at the moment. >> >> (California folks: I'm doing a consensus & community building workshop in >> the Bay Area soon, contact me back channel if you want more info.) >> >> ------------------------------ >> Eris Weaver, Facilitator & Group Process Consultant >> Founding member, FrogSong cohousing in Cotati, CA >> eris [at] erisweaver.info . 707-338-8589 . http://www.erisweaver.info >> >
- Re: decision-making process, (continued)
- Re: decision-making process Richart Keller, September 17 2014
- Re: decision-making process Sharon Villines, September 17 2014
-
Re: decision-making process Eris Weaver, September 18 2014
-
Re: decision-making process Richart Keller, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process Ann Zabaldo, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process Kevin Wolf, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process R Philip Dowds, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process R Philip Dowds, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process Sharon Villines, September 19 2014
-
Re: decision-making process Richart Keller, September 18 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.