Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowds![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 04:46:26 -0800 (PST) |
A stimulating and beautifully crafted article. As a cohouser and off-the-clock eldercare architect, I picked up on the part of “Help the generations come together” (below). Having designed and/or served many eldercare institutions, the conclusion I reached is that age-segregated housing is more curse than blessing … and this article explores the same view. Deep aging within the cohousing culture may offer many advantages — but probably more so, in multi-generational communities. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA PS: I typed in the word “cohouser”, but proofing the text, I discovered that the spellchecker auto-fixer had substituted the word “shouter”. I really have to do something about this spellchecker thingy … > On Dec 22, 2015, at 9:32 AM, miranda castro via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > > Here’s the Wall Street Journal article - it was a bit tricky to get without a > subscription … and seriously interesting > How to Make the Most of Longer Lives > > … > > Help the generations come together. > > For half a century, we’ve done much to keep young and old apart, especially > in the realm of housing. Yet age-segregated housing for retirees runs against > the grain of everything we know about healthy development in the post-midlife > period, a time when connections with younger generations are linked to higher > rates of happiness for older people. What we need instead: housing strategies > that help to forge and solidify bonds among the generations. > > One compelling example is Bridge Meadows. This housing development in > Portland, Ore., brings together families raising foster children with older > people of modest means, who receive reduced rents in return for volunteer > work with the adoptive families living in the community: everything from baby > sitting and playing catch with children to working on arts-and-crafts > projects and making meals. It’s an arrangement that makes both economic and > common sense, filling the fundamental human need for community and connection. > > I’d like to see more housing development animated by that same compelling > vision—especially as more families show an interest in moving in together, > sometimes with three or four generations residing under the same roof. (A > 2011 study by the nonprofit Generations United found that approximately one > in six Americans resides in a multigenerational household, a 10% jump since > the start of the recession.) We now likewise have an expanding cohort of > individuals without children or grandchildren of their own, along with > millions who don’t live anywhere near their younger relatives. These > individuals might well be drawn to, and benefit from, such intergenerational > settings. > > ...
-
Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Ann Zabaldo, December 19 2015
-
Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Fred-List manager, December 21 2015
-
Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject castrohom, December 22 2015
- Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject R Philip Dowds, December 23 2015
- Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Sharon Villines, December 23 2015
- Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Elizabeth Magill, December 23 2015
- Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject R Philip Dowds, December 23 2015
- Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Sharon Villines, December 23 2015
-
Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject castrohom, December 22 2015
-
Re: Deep Aging (TM); And a Totally Different Subject Fred-List manager, December 21 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.