Re: Use of science/facts in decision making | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Magill (pastorlizm![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 10:16:22 -0800 (PST) |
So smoking policies are one of the situations I wonder about. If one person believes that if their child walks through an outdoor area where there is smoke they will probably get lung cancer, is there any way to use facts to help resolve that discussion? -Liz (The Rev.) Elizabeth M. Magill www.ecclesiaministriesmission.org www.mosaic-commons.org 508-450-0431 > On Dec 31, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Richard L Kohlhaas <rlkohl [at] earthlink.net> > wrote: > > In our early days, we had endless discussions over a pet policy and a smoking > policy.
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making, (continued)
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Mary Baker, Solid Communications, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Alan O'Hashi, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Richard L Kohlhaas, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making John Beutler, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Elizabeth Magill, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Mary English, December 31 2016
- Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Sharon Villines, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Richard L Kohlhaas, December 31 2016
-
Re: Use of science/facts in decision making Mary Baker, Solid Communications, December 31 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.