Re: co-care agreements? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:21:40 -0800 (PST) |
One of the things we have done as a practice, not a policy, is that the person chooses a spokesperson who can be contacted for questions and who knows what a person needs. This has worked very well for illnesses longer than a week or so. It relieves the sick person from having to answer questions over and over, and for residents to be informed and respect privacy. Sharon > On Jan 26, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Eris Weaver <eris [at] erisweaver.info> wrote: > > > Muriel Kranowski wrote: > >>> My takeaway was that, at least in the abstract, we're willing to provide > >>> and to accept various kinds of concrete shortish-term help and some > >>> medium-term help, but most people didn't want to give or accept very > >>> personal or quasi-medical care or to make open-ended commitments except > of > >>> a trivial kind. > > > > Here's another thing that gets left out of these conversations. > > > > While we have community-wide agreements and expectations, we also have > individual relationships with each other. Some of my neighbors are like > family to me; some I wouldn't necessarily choose as friends but we have > cordial working relationships; I have ongoing low-level conflict with one. > Most of us are going to be willing to invest far more time and effort - and > of a more intimate nature - helping those with whom we have deeper > relationships. (I was willing to give B an occasional ride to the doctor; I > spent time in the hospital spoonfeeding A.) We also differ in our > willingness to receive certain kinds of help (W did NOT want any community > member doing ANY personal care at all). How much people are willing & able > to help others also depends upon their own burdens at the time - I have less > energy to help others when my wife is recovering from surgery. > > > > Any community-wide agreements made about all this are necessarily going to > be abstract and somewhat vague. It's still useful to have the conversation, > but be wary of making assumptions that because we're in community we're > going to be able to take care of everyone's every need, or that people will > be cared for equally. > > ******************************************** > > Eris Weaver, FrogSong Cohousing (Cotati, CA) > > Graphic Facilitator & Group Process Consultant > > eris [at] erisweaver.info . 707-338-8589 . http://www.erisweaver.info > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: co-care agreements?, (continued)
- Re: co-care agreements? Chris ScottHanson, January 26 2017
-
Re: co-care agreements? Sharon Villines, January 25 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Muriel Kranowski, January 25 2017
-
Re: co-care agreements? Eris Weaver, January 26 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Sharon Villines, January 26 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Muriel Kranowski, January 26 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Beverly Jones Redekop, January 26 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Cohousing, January 27 2017
- Re: co-care agreements? Sharon Villines, January 27 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.