Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David Heimann (heimann![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT) |
Hello,Another specialization on cohousing is Jewish cohousing, which Roger Studley from the Berkeley Moshav posted about on March 16-17 is a thread about "'Specialized' Cohousing". In that thread, Roger gave details about how a specialty theme works, specially a Jewish one. Also Sharon Villines emphasized the necessity of having a solid theme for the specialty to coalesce around -- e.g., Jewish cohousing has Judaism, with all its tradition and body of knowledge (and an active organization of Jewish intentional communities, see Robert Tabak's October 31, 2016, post to this list), whereas an artist cohousing does not and hence makes it more difficult to organize.
Someone also mentioned Camelot Cohousing which, similar to the aforementioned Silver Sage Cohousing and Bartimaeous Community developments, partnered with a non-specialized cohousing community (Mosaic Commons) in building their vision (they remain active and you may want to check with them to see if they're still living their specialty of medievalism).
Good luck, and all the best! Regards, David Heimann Jamaica Plain Cohousing Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 06:17:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Fred H Olson <fholson [at] cohousing.org> To: Cohousing-L mailing list <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704050550520.794 [at] web02.tigertech.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I would argue that cohousing communities will often have shared interests that naturally arise out of the interests of the members. And that shared interest may play a role in who decides to join. That is, people become aware of and self select in part because they are attracted to communities with members with whom they share some interests or at least a general perspective. This relates to the difficulty of some kinds of diversity that has been noted in threads on that topic. Whether that shared interest rises to the level of being a "theme" will vary and probably seldom be a defining characteristic. And the shared interest may be rather general. One community that, as I understand it, had a shared interest in community organizing is / was On Going Concerns community in Portland Oregon. They have not been very connected to other cohousing communities much. They are not in the directory -- http://cohousing.org/directory . I do not know how the community is doing - I do not have any contacts there. I did visit them years ago. I think they were on a tour or were open to visitors related to a cohousing conference years ago. I have this little page about them: http://mn.cohousing.org/retrofit/ongoing.htm Can anyone give an update on them? Fred -- Bassett Creek Cohousing, Minneapolis http://mn.cohousing.org/bcrk/ Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Email: fholson at cohousing.org 612-588-9532 My Link Pg: http://fholson.cohousing.org
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing, (continued)
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Fred H Olson, April 5 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Beverly Jones Redekop, April 5 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Roger Studley, April 5 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Liz Brown, April 5 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Beverly Jones Redekop, April 5 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Fred H Olson, April 5 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing David Heimann, April 6 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Sharon Villines, April 6 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.