|Re: ...financial relief||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcomeolympus.net)|
|Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT)|
At RoseWind Cohousing (long built in Port Townsend WA ), where our assessment dues are around $120 a month, we have built into the annual budget a line item called Assessment Relief. This funds a 20% reduction in assessment for a given number of families, based on how many self identified as having financial hardship: for some years this has been 5 households, of our 24 total. The up side of this is its simplicity: just ask the treasurer, and unless insufficient funds have been alloted, get the discount. If demand exceeds supply, the supply is equally divided among those requesting. Another positive is that it avoids having lower-income members drive the total budget down to a lowest common denominator, cutting out funding for items valuable to many others. The down side has turned out to be in the specifics. Four of the 5 recipients are non-participating members. One because she's elderly, in a nursing home, with a renter in the house, two who don't find time in their busy work schedules, and one who is generally antagonistic to the community. So we have participating members who are financially subsidizing non-participants. Which irks some, as a matter of principle. In the case of urgent crisis situations - like job loss coupled with health emergency -- we do voluntary fund raising, collecting donations, and/or staging benefit events, and generous help is available. The budget line item tends to be used by the same families year after year, based on general level of income and resources. Our assessment relief funding is currently under discussion here. Is it a social contract that is missing one side of the agreement? Participation here is "expected" but not required. Is it tolerable to not participate in the work and social life as long as you are paying full price, but not if you are receiving a subsidy? Do we even want the participation of a contentious and antagonistic member? And yet, we don't want a lowest-common-denominator budget, nor the complexities of determining and judging financial need, with so many variables. Twenty-eight years in, we are still trying to figure this out! Maraiah Lynn Nadeau www.rosewind.org
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.