Re: Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ken Winter (kensunward.org) | |
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:10:44 -0800 (PST) |
Yes. I hope the article addresses the one-time and ongoing effort-and-$ costs, as we experienced them, of submetering systems for utility billing. As RPD said, your results may differ. On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:42 PM R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L < cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > I think the closing sentence of my third paragraph was supposed to be > referencing the additional cost and effort of sub-metering. As was my > final paragraph. Sub-metering is definitely one of the technical options. > Is it worth it? To whom? (No reason for everybody to come up with the > same answer …) > > Thanks, > RPD > > > On Mar 10, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Ken Winter <ken [at] sunward.org> wrote: > > > > The third alternative is submetering of unit utilities. See > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/14kO0ncu6-G0W_qJKJqsjxXT9xYAotIWSXGhqTK1aF0c/edit?usp=sharing > > for more. > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:35 AM R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L < > > cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > > >> I here detect some alternative philosophies about cost sharing in > >> cohousing. > >> > >> The most communitarian is all-in-together, w/ each dwelling unit or > >> household paying an equal share, one-for-one. The popular variant of > this > >> approach is that all common expenses are split in proportion to unit > value, > >> for which unit square footage is seen as an acceptable proxy. > >> > >> At the other end of the scale, we have pay-per-use. Separate utility > >> metering is popular for those who advocate pay-per-use — partly because > the > >> frugal don’t want to pay for the extravagances of those who “waste” > power, > >> water, etc, and partly because many believe that wastefulness is more > >> likely if no measurable financial penalty accrues to the profligate. > But > >> it is usually true that one common meter will deliver utilities at > >> significantly lower cost all around than many individual meters. After > >> committing to one common meter, it’s a matter of how much additional > time > >> and money one wants to spend recapturing the data lost from, and > >> re-assigning dollar costs to, the individual households. > >> > >> There are odd gray areas between these two extremes. Some communities > >> have a per use charging system for common laundry equipment, and in > other > >> communities, laundry machines are provide as a “free” amenity available > to > >> all, just like the common kitchen or toilets. I’ve never heard of pay > >> toilets in cohousing, but it’s kind of the logical end point of the > >> pay-per-use model. > >> > >> Speaking as the Treasurer of a community which has fairly complex > >> pay-per-use protocols, my general advice is: Be sure it’s really worth > it > >> to you. You can end up with pretty elaborate accounting challenges. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> RPD > >> > >>> On Mar 10, 2021, at 11:05 AM, Ken Winter <ken [at] sunward.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'd strongly urge you to build in a system where each unit pays for its > >>> actual, measured usage of water, electricity, and gas. You can get > >> actual > >>> measurements for each unit in two ways: (1) each unit has a meter > >> provided > >>> by the local utility and pays the utility directly, or (2) the local > >>> utility has meters on each building and the community has submeters for > >>> each unit, the community pays the utility and each unit owner pays the > >>> community for that unit's usage as measured by its submeter. At > Sunward > >>> Cohousing, after 20 years of "we all pay for everything", we have > >>> retrofitted submeters into our water billing system. For what we did, > >> why, > >>> and how, see > >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/14kO0ncu6-G0W_qJKJqsjxXT9xYAotIWSXGhqTK1aF0c/edit?usp=sharing > >> . > >>> This article is a quite incomplete work-in-progress, but the "why" > >> section > >>> is pretty solid. > >>> > >>> ~ Ken Winter, Sunward Cohousing, Ann Arbor MI > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:51 AM Jim Bronson < > jimbronsonashland [at] gmail.com > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear Cohousing Communities, > >>>> > >>>> River Song is planning to break ground soon. We are thinking about > >> having > >>>> one electric meter per building and one water meter for the whole > >> community > >>>> to save costs - which may be as much as $600/month compared to having > >>>> meters for each unit. > >>>> > >>>> When we are up and running our HOA will allocate common costs monthly > or > >>>> quarterly. We have heard from other cohousing communities that they > >> have > >>>> evolved a way of fairly allocating common costs using an algorithm > >> based on > >>>> # of adults and square footage for each unit. > >>>> > >>>> For our planning, I have attached a one page MS Word doc that shows an > >>>> example of how we think this could look for the simple case of a 4 > unit > >>>> cohousing community. I would appreciate hearing from communities > >>>> experienced in using algorithm allocation for common costs about what > >> they > >>>> have learned. Also, I would like to know how their algorithms may > allow > >>>> for individual variations, for example a private unit having their own > >>>> solar pv, having a hot tub or an electric car charging station, etc. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for sharing what you have learned. > >>>> Jim Bronson (for the Design Team) > >>>> River Song Cohousing Community > >>>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > >>>> http://L.cohousing.org/info > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > >>> http://L.cohousing.org/info > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _________________________________________________________________ > >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > >> http://L.cohousing.org/info > >> > >> > >> > >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > >
- Re: Sub-metering [was Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft., (continued)
- Re: Sub-metering [was Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. Ken Winter, March 10 2021
-
Re: Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. R Philip Dowds, March 10 2021
- Re: Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. Ken Winter, March 10 2021
- Re: Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. R Philip Dowds, March 10 2021
- Re: Allocating Common Costs by an Algorithm e.g. based on # adults and sq. ft. Ken Winter, March 10 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.