Any data on traffic studies for cohousing? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: mike slama (mike.slama.coho![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT) |
Puyallup Cohousing is a forming community in Pierce County near Puyallup, WA. We own 10.75 acres zoned for medium density residential at 4 units/acre. We are in the process of working with a local civil engineering firm to conduct the necessary studies for development. Wetlands, Septic, GeoTech, and Water look good so far. The next study requested by the county involves traffic analysis. The ‘dance' in this county involves a (well-known, respected) traffic engineering firm making a “Traffic Impact Analysis Scoping" proposal to the county. After their discussion and acceptance, a “Traffic Impact Analysis" of the local streets and intersections is performed. Their first draft “Scoping Proposal” includes the following verbiage: <<...The magnitude of the anticipated vehicle trip generation for the proposed project was derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication, Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. In review of the trip generation manual, there are no defined Land Use Codes (LUC) for community co-house style units. Therefore, LUC 215- Single-Family Attached Housing was determined to be the most representative which is commonly applied towards townhouse units and was considered similar in nature...>> There’s lots more in their proposal, but the end result is that they come up with an assumed number of 6.4 daily trips per unit. I’ve heard many anecdotal reports suggesting that the actual number of trips/day for cohousing communities is lower. Sadly, my engineering background has convinced me that the plural of ‘anecdote’ is not ‘data’. Does anyone on the listserve have any leads on real traffic data for actual cohousing communities? Thanks in advance, Mike Slama https://puyallupcohousing.org <https://puyallupcohousing.org/>
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.