Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mariana Almeida (missmgrrl![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:21:11 -0800 (PST) |
A very challenging problem indeed. Some cities have dealt with this by offering down payment assistance to new home owners, and then they get a cut of the appreciation if the buyer ever sells. Example: https://housing.lacity.org/housing/help-moderate-income-first-home-buyers Perhaps there are individuals who can do this on behalf of others?? Mariana PS - do you all have a website?? I'm in Berkeley and would love to know where your project will be! On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 01:02:55 PM PST, Jane R. Mueller <jmueller [at] wellchosenwords.net> wrote: Dear Cohousing Communitarians~ One of the best pieces of advice MIssion Peak Village received as a forming community was not to re-invent the wheel. We face a dilemma that many other communities have likely faced, and we could use your help. If you came up with a good way to deal with this, would you please share it? We have submitted plans to the City for approval and are now actively recruiting new Members. Covering pre-development costs is high priority but so is creating an age-diverse community. So far, however, our Members and Explorers come predominantly from mature, more established households that already own property. Our current financial structure asks Members to start committing housing funds 3-4 years in advance of project completion—and be 20% invested approximately two years before the living space will be available to occupy, which is when we will need to qualify for our construction loan. Younger prospective members find this particularly challenging. Here are some of the reasons: * In most cases, young adults are not in a position to buy a home until they have been in the work force for awhile; young adults may not only be saving for home ownership but also focusing on career development. Also, here in the San Francisco Bay Area, they are likely paying exorbitant rent. * Especially for younger households, their conditions could undergo significant change during that 3-4 year period, e.g. o Their employment could necessitate relocation o Having kids could reduce family income and increase expenses * If they should need to change plans, our financial structure ties up their housing funds and makes them inaccessible until we have sold out our project, approximately 2026. We would love to devise a financial arrangement that covers the Mission Peak Village's pre-development costs, qualifies the us for needed loans, requires real Member commitment to the project, and yet fairly accommodates the needs of younger Members whose plans may change unavoidably. How's THAT for a challenge? Have you found solutions? Jane Mueller Mission Peak Village Fremont, CA _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://L.cohousing.org/info
-
Financial approach for younger prospective members Jane R. Mueller, November 8 2022
- Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members Rebecca J. Hogue, November 8 2022
- Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members Mariana Almeida, November 9 2022
- Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members John Pustell, November 11 2022
-
Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members Sharon Villines, November 10 2022
- Re: Financial approach for younger prospective members Karen Kitchen, November 11 2022
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.